In the predicted future trend of "Communities of Practice," Bucy claims that "common interest, experience and pursuits rather than proximity will bind...communities together [throughout the world]." For the "Entertainment" aspect, I really don't think this trend is applicable globally. I think a country's entertainment industry is a direct reflection of their own social standards and norms. This is best demonstrated by comparing and contrasting the conflicting views between China's entertainment culture and how the US view differs. An example of different interpretations was shown in the controversy that took place at the 2008 opening ceremonies in Beijing China.
As explained in article in the New York Times, "Miaoke, a third grader, was judged cute and appealing but 'not suitable' as a singer. Another girl, Yang Peiyi, 7, was judged the best singer but not as cute. So when Miaoke opened her mouth to sing, the voice that was actually heard was a recording of Peiyi." (Yardly, 2008) Many Americans took offense to this and felt deceived and mislead, however the the Chinese government claimed it simply "has taken great pains to present the best possible image to the outside world during the Olympics, and perfection was the goal for the dazzling opening ceremonies." (Yardly, 2008) This is just one example of two countries dealing with the ability of rising technology and different cultural understandings.
Although the ceremonies did bring countries all across the world together via media and their was a global "common interest" and the "pursuit" of the same goals, when it came it the entertainment aspect, the Chinese true cultural identity was shown through their high appreciation for ascetics, which was then criticized by the US.
Yardly , Jim (2008, Aug, 8). In Grand Olympic Show, Some Sleight of Voice . New York Times , Retrieved 3/2/09, from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/13/sports/olympics/13beijing.html?scp=1&sq=Miaoke%20olympics&st=cse
I am curious to see was the United States would have done if they had to present themselves to the entire world for the first time. Why wouldn't they want to be perceived as the best. It was only natural for China to want everything to be in pristine condition.
ReplyDeleteThe opening ceremonies were executed with extraordinary precision. The concepts behind all of the aspects were breathtaking and truly original. Human rights were violated in order to guarantee perfection. While I disagree with the decisions to expose third graders to such harsh judgment, I understand why it was done. In today's society first impressions are imperative therefore first impressions to the entire world must be flawless.